Rishi Nagpal v. State Of Punjab

Crl. Misc. No. M-19636 of 2016 -1In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Misc. No. M-19636 of 2016 Date of Decision: 23.8.2016 Rishi Nagpal ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY

Present:

Mr. Tarun Seth, Advocate for Mr. B.S.Jaswal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. V.P.S.Sidhu, AAG, Punjab.

None for respondent No. 2.

**** ANITA CHAUDHRY, J (ORAL) Through the instant petition, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 84 dated 21.7.2015, registered under Sections 406, 498-A, 420, 120-B IPC and subsequently added Sections under Sections 465, 468, 471 IPC Police Station Women, Ludhiana. Counsel for the petitioner states that pursuant to the order dated 1.6.2016, passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation. State counsel states that the petitioner has joined the investigation.

Looking to the circumstances, but without commenting on the merits of the case, the petition is allowed and order dated 1.6.2016 granting interim bail to the petitioner is made absolute subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438 Sub Section 2 Clauses (i)(ii) and (iii) of the Code of Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2016.08.24 10:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

Crl. Misc. No. M-19636 of 2016 -2Criminal Procedure.

(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE August 23, 2016 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2016.08.24 10:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh