High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/18739/2017allowed

Amarjit Singh v. State Of Punjab

2017-08-09Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj2 pages

CRM-M-18739-2017 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH.

Crl. Misc. No.M-18739 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 09, 2017 Amarjit Singh ......PETITIONER(s).

VERSUS

State of Punjab ....RESPONDENT(s).

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Rohani Chadha, Advocate for Mr. Rahul Bhargava, Advocate for the petitioner (s).

Ms. Rajni Gupta, Senior D.A.G. Punjab.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.350 dated 27.09.2014 registered for the offences punishable under Section 382 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, at Police Station Civil Lines, District Amritsar.

Heard.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has instructions to state at bar that petitioner has surrendered before the trial Court and has been allowed interim bail under the order dated 24.05.2017. Petitioner was on regular bail in this case and his bail was cancelled due to his non-appearance on 29.11.2016. He was in custody in case bearing FIR Sachin Mehta 2017.08.10 16:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-18739-2017 -2No.468 of 2014, as such, could not appear. He was also summoned by Court through production warrants.

In view of submission of learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is allowed and the order dated 24.05.2017 is made absolute subject to the condition that petitioner shall appear before the trial Court on each and every date of hearing. In the event of his non-appearance on any date, the trial Court will be competent to cancel his bail and forfeit the bail bond and surety bond and that the petitioner may be taken into custody. ( SURINDER GUPTA ) August 09, 2017 JUDGE Sachin M.

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Sachin Mehta 2017.08.10 16:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH