High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/18766/2015allowed

Sandeep Alias Satish & ORS. v. State Of Haryana

2015-06-05Mr. Justice P.B. Bajanthri2 pages

Cr.M.No.18766 of 2015 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.M.No.M-18766 of 2015 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : 5.6.2015 Sandeep alias Satish and others PETITIONERS

VERSUS

The State of Haryana RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER

1. Whether reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present:- Shri R.N.Lohan, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Deepak Sabarwal, Additional A.G. Haryana. MAHESH GROVER, J.

This is a petition filed under section 439 Cr.P.C. with a prayer for release of the petitioner on bail in a case registered vide F.I.R. No.290 dated 26.4.2015 under Sections 3,4,5,6 of the P.I.T. Act, 1956 at Police Station City, Jind.

Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and they are in custody since 26.4.2015 and GHANSHYAM DASS 2015.06.05 13:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document high court chandigarh

Cr.M.No.18766 of 2015 -2challan has already been submitted which fact is not controverted by the learned counsel for the State who however, contends that petitioners are running a brothel which is an immoral activity under the provisions of the above mentioned Act. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and noticing the fact that petitioners are in custody since April, 2015 and challan has already been submitted and no useful purpose will be served by keeping the petitioners in jail particularly when the trial is likely to take some time, I deem it appropriate to accept the instant petition and enlarge the petitioners on bail on their furnishing adequate surety to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate which shall do well to ensure some local/heavy surety so as to obviate the chances of any default by the petitioners.

Nothing stated hereinabove shall be construed to be an expression of opinion on the merits of the case.

(MAHESH GROVER) June 5, 2015 JUDGE GD GHANSHYAM DASS 2015.06.05 13:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document high court chandigarh