Heena Bansal & ANR v. State Of Punjab & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Crl. Misc. No. M-18855 of 2014 Crl. Misc. No. M-18855 of 2014 Crl. Misc. No. M-18855 of 2014 Crl. Misc. No. M-18855 of 2014 Date of Decision: 2 Date of Decision: 2 Date of Decision: 2 Date of Decision: 2nd nd nd nd February, 2015 February, 2015 February, 2015 February, 2015 Heena Bansal and another ....Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and others ....Respondents ****

CORAM:

CORAM:

CORAM:

CORAM:

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Daya Chaudhary Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Daya Chaudhary Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Daya Chaudhary Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Daya Chaudhary **** **** **** ****

Present:

None for the petitioners.

Ms. Ritu Punj, Addl. A.G., Punjab.

**** **** **** **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.(Oral) DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.(Oral) DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.(Oral) DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners was neither present on the last date of hearing nor today.

Learned State counsel, on instructions from Sub Inspector Balwinder Singh submits that the petitioners have made a statement that they are not in need of any protection now.

The present petition has, therefore, become infructuous. Dismissed as having become infructuous.

02.02.2015 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) (DAYA CHAUDHARY) (DAYA CHAUDHARY) (DAYA CHAUDHARY) sonia g.

sonia g.

sonia g.

sonia g.

JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE