Mamta v. Vikash



IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.104 TA-303-2024 Date of Decision: 17.02.2025   ....Applicant

Versus

  .....Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present:- Mr. Pradeep Choker, Advocate for the applicant.

Respondent proceeded against ex parte vide order dated 04.12.2024.

***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral)
 

 

    

            



  !"!#$  
  

 %&  

% $     '(&  $    (  

  ( 

)   *  +      $ 

  (    $      ,     

 + %(

%&     

   (   

    

$    (  (

  - "-!"-  .

  % (   $

     

     /         (    / ($ ( $   %(     



 ( (   $             
 Sonu 2025.02.17 14:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document P&HHC

   

      $   

    0/ $       -! 1 $          * $     12
 

 (                  +     (  $     %(

       

$  ((   %

-"( 3 4$              In view of the aforesaid fact situation and also considering the position of law about preference to be given to the convenience of the wife in the transfer applications relating to the matrimonial dispute, more particularly, while the respondent has not come forth to contest the application, the transfer application is allowed and      

    

  !"!#$  
  

  %&  

% $    ( '(&  $ $     ( 

)   * 
5     %

%& '(&  $$        6$*  ,      6$* $        '(&  $* 0/ $     % '(&  $* $    (

(

&

 (ARCHANA PURI) 17.02.2025 JUDGE Himanshu Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

Yes/No Sonu 2025.02.17 14:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document P&HHC