Madan Singh v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-18867 of 2017 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM-M-18867 of 2017 Date of Decision: 01.06.2017 Madan Singh ....Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr.Abhimanyu Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Harpreet Kaur, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Sunil Chaudhary, Advocate for the complainant.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 439 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.200 dated 27.05.2016 registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 302 read with Section 149 of Indian Penal Code (for short, "IPC") and 25 of the Arms Act, at Police Station Sadar Dadri, District Bhiwani. Heard.

This is third application seeking regular bail to the petitioner. Earlier applications were dismissed on 11.11.2016 and 17.02.2017. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after dismissal of earlier bail applications, the challan has been presented and charges have been framed against the petitioner.

Presentation of challan and framing of charges against the petitioner make out no reason or suggest change of circumstances to extend the benefit of regular bail to petitioner.

Jitender Kumar 2017.06.02 12:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-18867 of 2017 -2In view of above, I find no reason to extend the benefit of regular bail to the petitioner and the instant petition is dismissed in terms of detailed order dated 17.02.2017, dismissing the second bail application of petitioner.

June 01, 2017 ( SURINDER GUPTA ) jk JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Jitender Kumar 2017.06.02 12:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH