Inder Singh Dhawan v. Sham S. Lal

CRM-M-1893-2015 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-1893-2015 Date of Decision: January 08, 2016 Inder Singh Dhawan .....Petitioner

Versus

Sham S.Lal ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr.P.S.Hundal, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Dinesh Trehan, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.K.S.Sidhu, Sr.Advocate with Mr.A.S.Sandhu, Advocate for the respondent.

........

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.(ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition to enable the petitioner to challenge the order of summoning by way of revision petition before the Court of Session at first instance. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection MEENU 2016.01.12 12:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CRM-M-1893-2015 -2to the above prayer of the learned counsel for the petitioner. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is disposed of with a direction that if the petitioner files a revision petition impugning the summoning order along with an application for condonation of delay within one month, the said application for condonation of delay shall be decided keeping in view the fact that the petitioner has approached this Court.

January 08, 2016 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE MEENU 2016.01.12 12:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh