Sonu v. State Of Haryana
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 12.09.2023 Sonu ..Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana ..Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present:
Ms. Shweta Bawa, Advocate for Mr. Balraj Gujjar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Baljinder Singh Virk, Sr. DAG, Haryana.
*** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J.
1.
On 15.03.2023, this Court had passed the following order:- "
!! " "
#$
"
%& %'%( ) *
+(
+ , -
(.
. / ++
+
% /
/
( +
.
01
-
(. +
+ +
++
(
+
3
1 4
004%(
, .
5 ( / / ++
(
+
. .
+ 01 """"6,
5 /( +
/ / .
+ + (
/
(
+
+7 +
( /
(
!"""6, . / +
.
3 /( +
. 7 /
3 (1
+ 7
0 26
/ 2
7 /
.
/
(
/
' )
!""# " "
2.
Learned counsel submits that in pursuance of the aforementioned order, the petitioner has not only joined investigation but also fully cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that in case the investigating agency requires the petitioner to appear, he shall make himself available without demur.
3.
Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Rohtash affirms the factum of joining the investigation by the petitioner and cooperating with the investigating agency. He also submits that at this stage, the petitioner is not required for any custodial interrogation. 4.
In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner is allowed and the order dated 15.03.2023 granting interim bail to him, is hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions as specified under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C
5.
However, it is made clear that if the petitioner fails to join and cooperate with the investigating agency as and when required, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of the present anticipatory bail granted to him.
( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) 12.09.2023 JUDGE Ankur Whether speaking/reasoned :
Yes/No Whether reportable :
Yes/No