Heena v. State Of Punjab And ORS.

CRM-M-11872-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.11872 of 2025
Date of Decision: 03.03.2025
Heena ......... Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others ......... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. GREWAL

Present

Ms. Dipsy Gupta, Advocate (Through VC) for the petitioner(s).

**** H. S. GREWAL, J.

The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for issuance of direction to respondent Nos.2 and 3 to decide representation dated 26.04.2024 (Annexure P-1) against respondent Nos.5 to 8 for committing offences and playing fraud with the Embassy of India and that of United Kingdom.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner is aggrieved by the official respondents for not considering his application against respondent Nos.5 to 8. He further contends that he would be satisfied in case his representation dated 26.04.2024 (Annexure P-1) be decided in a time bound manner.
3.

Notice of motion.
4.

On the asking of the Court, Mr. Amandeep Singh Samra, AAG, Punjab, who is present in Court accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State. Sonia Puri 2025.03.03 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-11872-2025

5.

In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, the petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation within a period of 07 days from today. Thereafter, in case, fresh representation is filed, the Senior Superintendent of Police, Jalandhar is directed to decide the said representation) within a period of one month thereafter, by passing a speaking order. 6.

Given above, the petition stands disposed of. (H.S. GREWAL) JUDGE
03.03.2025 Sonia Puri Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Sonia Puri 2025.03.03 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document