High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/19052/2017allowed

Mainpal v. State Of Haryana

2017-10-27Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj2 pages

CRM-M-19052-2017 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH.

Crl. Misc. No.M-19052 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 27, 2017 Mainpal ......PETITIONER(s).

VERSUS

State of Haryana ....RESPONDENT(s).

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Gourav Verma, Advocate for the petitioner (s).

Mr. Ashish Yadav, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 373 dated 05.10.2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 380, 454 of Indian Penal Code (for short IPC) (Sections 148, 447, 452, 506 read with Section 149 IPC added later on) at Police Station Indri, District Karnal.

Heard.

Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Ved Pal submits that petitioner has joined the investigation which is still in progress. The allegations levelled by the complainant is that she was dispossessed from the premises of Aapo Aap Radha Krishan Mandir. The Investigating Officer is looking into her allegations and no recovery is to be effected from Jyoti 2017.10.27 14:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRM-M-19052-2017 -2petitioner.

In view of submission of learned State counsel but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is allowed and the order dated 25.05.2017 is made absolute till the presentation of challan, subject to the following terms:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by the police as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the accusation against him so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court.

(iv) that the petitioner will seek regular bail on the presentation of challan in Court, which the trial Court will decide on the basis of evidence collected during investigation.

( SURINDER GUPTA ) October 27, 2017 JUDGE Jyoti-II Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Jyoti 2017.10.27 14:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document