Ranbir Saini v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-11640-2025 Date of Decision: 04.03.2025 Ranbir Saini

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Sanjeev Majra, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Trishanjali Sharma, D.A.G., Haryana.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

FIR No.

Dated Police Station Sections 21.08.2020 Sector 9-A, District Gurugram 148, 149, 307, 302 IPC and 25 of Arms Act (Section 120-B, 216 IPC added later on) 1.

Seeking directions to the trial Court to conclude the trial in the FIR captioned above in accordance with the directions passed by this Court in CRM-M No.50701 of 2024, the petitioner has come up before this Court under Section 528 BNSS r/w Article 21 of Constitution of India.

2.

Notices served upon the official respondents through the State's counsel. Given the nature of the order that this Court proposes to pass, neither the response of official respondents nor the issuance of notices to the private respondents is required. 3.

This Court would not like to interfere in the docket of the trial Court but given the previous order passed in CRM-M No.50701 of 2024, this Court only requests the trial Court to expedite the trial as early as possible and to take up the matter on top most priority.

4.

Given above, the present petition is disposed of. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 04.03.2025 Jyoti Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable:

No.

Jyoti Sharma 2025.03.07 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh