Ahmad Sahid v. State Of Haryana And Others

CRM-M-12571-2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-12571-2019

Reserved on: 28.04.2022

Pronounced on: 13.07.2022 Ahmad Sahid

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Abhishek Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajat Gautam, DAG, Haryana.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

FIR No.

Dated Police Station Sections 13.06.2012 Hodal, District Palwal 397, 223, 224, 225 and 34 IPC Criminal Case no.

Sessions Case No.RBT-108-2012 before trial Court Date of Decision: 20.05.2014 Cr.A no. before CRA-D-1437-DB-2014 High Court Date of Decision: 16.05.2018 Seeking modification of the order of sentence imposed by the trial court, wherein the court explicitly observed that the sentences shall run one after the other, and a Division Bench of this court upheld the conviction and sentence by dismissing the appeal, which has attained finality, the convict wants this court to exercise its inherent jurisdiction under section 482 Cr.P.C. and order the sentences to run concurrently. It is common sense that this court cannot give such a relief; furthermore, section 362 Cr.P.C. creates an express bar to do so.

Give above, the present petition is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 13.07.2022 Jyoti-II Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No.

JYOTI 2022.07.14 14:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document