Dilshad @ Irshad v. State Of Haryana And ORS.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CRM-M-20118-2016 Date of Decision:- 06.03.2017 Dilshad @ Irshad ....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana ....Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present:
Mr. P.K. Ganga, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Sabherwal, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
**** RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, in a case arising out of FIR No.672 dated 31.08.2015, under Sections 363/366-A (Sections 376(2), 327(2)(n), 328, 344, 506 IPC and POCSO Act were added later on), registered at Police Station City Sirsa. At the very outset, learned State counsel, on instructions from investigating officer, has informed that in pursuance of order dated 21.09.2016 of this Court, the petitioner has already joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required at this stage. In view of the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, order dated 21.09.2016, passed by this Court whereby the ad-interim anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join the investigation as and when required to do so and abide by all the conditions as envisaged under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.
Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. March 06, 2017 ( RITU BAHRI ) naresh.k JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Naresh Kumar 2017.03.08 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh