Anand Parkiash v. State Of Haryana And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH.

CWP No.8219 of 1999 Date of Decision : 19.1.2015 Anand Parkash ......Petitioner Vs.

State of Haryana and others ......Respondents ...

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK ...

Present :

None for the petitioner.

Mr. M.K. Sangwan, DAG, Haryana.

...

1. To be referred to the Reporter or not ?

2. Whether the judgement should be reported in Digest ? RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK, J Learned counsel for the State submits that since during the pendency of the present writ petition, the State Legislature framed the law by way of Haryana Act No.1 of 2014, no cause of action would survive in the present writ petition and the same may be disposed of, as having been rendered infructuous.

Neither anybody has come present to press this petition nor any request for pass over has been made on behalf of the petitioner. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the State, instant writ petition is disposed of, as having been rendered infructuous, however, granting liberty to the petitioner to lay challenge to the Haryana Act No.1 of 2014, if so advised.

Disposed of, accordingly.

19.1.2015 (RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK) GS JUDGE GREESH SAHNI 2015.01.20 15:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh