Varinder Singh v. Union Territory Chandigarh And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

C.W.P. No. 7665 of 2021 Date of decision: 29.08.2024 Varinder Singh .... Petitioner Vs.

U.T. Chandigarh and others .... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL

Present:

None for the petitioner.

Mr. Sumeet Jain, Addl. Standing Counsel for U.T. Chandigarh.

Ms. Madhu Dayal, Advocate with Mr. Gagandeep Singh Wasu, Advocate for the respondent No.2-CHB.

ARUN PALLI, J (Oral) None had appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the previous date of hearing. Position is not any different even today as none has caused appearance on behalf of the petitioner to pursue the matter. That being so, this court is choiceless but to dismiss the petition for non-prosecution.

Dismissed for non-prosecution.

(ARUN PALLI) JUDGE (VIKRAM AGGARWAL) JUDGE 29.08.2024 deepak Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR 2024.08.30 13:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document P & H High Court, Chandigarh