Seema v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-19222-2015 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-19222-2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 05, 2015 Seema .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI

Present:

Mr.Sanjeev Kodan, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Sanjay Singh, AAG, Haryana.

Mr.Chanderhas Yadav, Advocate for the informant.

........

1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.(Oral) Mr.Sanjeev Kodan, Advocate for the petitioner has filed the vakalatnama on behalf of the petitioner, which is taken on record. However, he prays for withdrawal of the present petition to enable the petitioner to file fresh one after the compromise, if need be.

MEENU 2015.10.06 14:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CRM-M-19222-2015 (O&M) -2Dismissed as withdrawn.

Interim directions issued vide order dated 28.08.2015 are hereby vacated.

October 05, 2015 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE MEENU 2015.10.06 14:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh