High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/22057/2013disposed of

Sunita v. State Of Punjab And ANR.

2015-01-09Mr. Justice S.C. Malte1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-22057-2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: January 09, 2015 Sunita .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI

Present:

Mr.Mohammad Shameem, Advocate for Mr.Sandeep Moudgil, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.R.S.Randhawa, Additional Advocate General, Punjab.

Mr.Pawan Jhanda, AAG, Haryana.

.......

Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J.(Oral) Learned proxy counsel contends that he has the instructions to plead that the substantive sentence of the petitioner has been suspended by Hon'ble the Supreme Court and, as such, the prayer for his transfer from Central Jail, Ambala to Central Jail, Patiala, has been rendered infructuous. The counsel for the respondents have not controverted the above prayer.

So ordered.

January 09, 2015 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE MEENU 2015.01.12 10:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh