← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRWP/3144/2021disposed of

Manish Khan And ANR v. State Of Haryana And Others

2021-04-01Mr. Justice Gurvinder Singh Gill2 pages

In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh CRWP-3144-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision:-1.4.2021 Dr. Manish Khan and another ... Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL Present:- Mr. Mohd. Shahid Hussain, Advocate for the petitioners. (proceedings conducted through video conferencing) ***** GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J.(Oral) 1.

Petitioner No.1-Dr. Manish Khan aged 27 years and petitioner No.2-Dr. Rashmi Chaudhary aged 25 years have approached this Court seeking protection as they apprehend threat to the same at the hands of private respondents, who are all relatives of petitioner No.2. While petitioner No.1 is Muslim by religion, petitioner No.2 is stated to be Hindu by religion but they have solemnized marriage as per Muslim Rites. It is apparently on account of the said fact that the relatives of petitioner No.2 are aggrieved by their marriage.

2.

Without commenting as regards the veracity of the averments made in the petition and also as regards the validity of alleged marriage of the petitioners, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2PANKAJ KAKKAR 2021.04.01 18:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

( 2 ) CRWP-3144-2021 (O&M) Superintendent of Police, Nuh, District Nuh (Mewat) to look into the matter and to dispose off the representation dated 22.3.2021 (Annexure P-4) in accordance with law. In case, it is found that there is a genuine threat to the lives and liberty of the petitioners, then necessary steps warranted under law be taken thereupon at the earliest so as to ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners.

3.

A copy of this order alongwith copy of the representation dated 22.3.2021 (Annexure P-4) be sent to respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Nuh, District Nuh (Mewat) so as to enable him to do the needful expeditiously. 4.

It is, however, clarified that the aforesaid order shall not be taken to be any expression as regards the validity of marriage of the petitioners and shall not confer any immunity upon the petitioners, in case it is found that they have committed any wrong.

1.4.2021 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) pankaj Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No PANKAJ KAKKAR 2021.04.01 18:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document