Pardeep v. State Of Haryana And ORS

CRM-M-19308-2015 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-19308-2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 13, 2015 Pardeep Kumar .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI

Present:

Mr.Rajiv Parshad, Advocate for Mr.Ritesh Parshad, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Sanjay Kumar, AAG, Haryana.

Mr.Pankaj Bali, Advocate for respondent Nos.5 to 14.

Mr.Vijay Kumar, Advocate for Mr.Munish Mittal, Advocate for respondent Nos.15 and 16.

........

1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.(Oral) Learned proxy counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the reply filed by the Deputy Superintendent of Police MEENU 2015.10.14 16:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CRM-M-19308-2015 (O&M) -2- (HQ), Karnal, he has the instructions not to press the present petition, at this stage.

Ordered accordingly.

October 13, 2015 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE MEENU 2015.10.14 16:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh