Ramandeep Kaur And ANR v. State Of Punjab And ORS

CRM No.M-19328 of 2015 [1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M- 19328 of 2015(O&M) Date of Decision: June 5 , 2015.

Ramandeep Kaur and another ...... PETITIONER (s)

Versus

State of Punjab and others ...... RESPONDENT (s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE LISA GILL

Present:

Petitioners in person with Mr. Madan Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioners.

***** LISA GILL, J.

Present petition has been filed by the petitioners for protection of their life and liberty as they apprehend danger at the hands of respondents No.4 to 7 and other relatives because they have contracted marriage between themselves on 04.06.2015 against the wishes of the said respondents. Both the petitioners are present in Court and on being asked submit that they have contracted marriage between themselves out of their free will and volition. It is contended that the petitioners are major, their dates of birth being 02.11.1991 and 06.02.1993, respectively. True copy of passport of petitioner No.2 has been appended with the petition as Annexure P1. However, only affidavit, Annexure P1, is appended with this petition regarding date of birth of petitioner No.1 as it is stated that she do not have any documentary proof OMKAR SINGH 2015.06.06 11:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CRM No.M-19328 of 2015 [2] regarding her age as they are on the run and the necessary documents are not readily available. A copy of the Marriage Certificate and the photographs of the marriage are also placed on record as Annexures P3 and P4. The petitioners are stated to have submitted a representation dated 04.06.2015 (Annexure P5) to respondent No.2 i.e., the Senior Superintendent of Police, Mohali for redressal of their grievance.

Notice of motion to the Advocate General, Punjab. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Jasdev Singh Brar, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab who is present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. Two copies of the petition have been handed over to learned State counsel.

Without commenting upon the age of the petitioners or the validity of their marriage or the validity and genuineness of the certificates appended with the petition, respondent No.2 - Senior Superintendent of Police, Mohali is directed to decide representation dated 04.06.2015 submitted by the petitioners and take appropriate action keeping in view the threat perception to the petitioners.

It is, however, made clear that this order shall have no effect on the validity of the alleged marriage of the petitioners and neither will any other civil or criminal proceedings initiated against the petitioners be barred due to this order.

Petition is disposed of accordingly.

( LISA GILL ) June 5 , 2015.

JUDGE 'om'

OMKAR SINGH 2015.06.06 11:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh