Amit Kumar v. UOI And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-11234-2022 Date of decision: 02.07.2026 AMIT KUMAR

...Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

UOI AND ANOTHER

...Respondent(s)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present:- Mr. Sardavinder Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. (Through Video Conferencing) Mr. Samarth Suri, Advocate for respondent No.2-Bank. **** JASGURPREET SINGH PURI, J. (Oral) 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner, who has joined the proceedings through video conferencing, submitted that he has been informed by the learned counsel for the respondent-Bank that the loan account has already been closed and therefore, the present petition has become infructuous and the same may be disposed of accordingly.

2.

Ordered accordingly.

(JASGURPREET SINGH PURI) JUDGE (SANJIV BERRY) 02.07.2026 JUDGE Chetan Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No CHETAN THAKUR 2026.07.03 16:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.