Harinder Pal Singh v. Raj Rani

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-20318-2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: 26.11.2018 Harinder Pal Singh .... Petitioner

Versus

Raj Rani .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN

Present:

None for the petitioner.

Mr. Gaurav Grover, Advocate for the respondent. RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Despite the case having been called twice, none has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the respondents prays for dismissal of instant petition as the petitioner has not paid even a single penny towards maintenance.

In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

It is, however, made clear that in case, any application for restoration of instant petition is filed by the petitioner, in that eventuality, the same shall be restored only subject to the condition that he would bring a demand draft towards total arrears of maintenance, in favour of respondent.

November 26, 2018 (RAMENDRA JAIN) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2018.11.29 14:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document