← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/20339/2016allowed

Gurpreet Singh & Other v. State Of Punjab & ANR

2016-10-19Mrs. Justice Raj Rahul Garg2 pages

CRM-M-20339-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-20339-2016 Date of Decision:- 19.10.2016 Gurpreet Singh and others ....Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and another ....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

Present:

Mr. Aman Pal, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. A.P.S. Gill, A.A.G. Punjab Mr. G.C. Bedi, Advocate for respondent No. 2 **** RITU BAHRI , J. (Oral) Quashing of FIR No.10 dated 08.08.2013 under Sections 406 and 498-A IPC, registered at Police Station Mataur (Women Cell), District SAS Nagar, is being sought on the basis of compromise dated 14.12.2015 (Annexure P-2).

Respondent No. 2 got married to petitioner No. 1 on 23.01.2011. Due to temperamental differences, both the parties could not live together as husband and wife. The relationship between them became strain and thereafter, the F.I.R was registered against the petitioners on account of bringing less dowry and harassment caused by the petitioners. Naresh Kumar 2016.10.22 09:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CRM-M-20339-2016 However, the matter has now been duly compromised, vide compromise dated 14.12.2015 (Annexure P-2).

In compliance of order dated 03.06.2016, report of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Mohali, dated 19.07.2016 has been received. As per report, statement of parties have been recorded. Complainant stated that the matter stands compromised between the parties and she does not want to proceed further against the accused and has no objection, if the present F.I.R be quashed against the petitioners. The compromise has been entered voluntarily. To the same effect is the statements given by the petitioners. Consequently, in view of the report dated 19.07.2016 and in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Dr. Arvind Barsaul etc. versus State of Madhya Pradesh and another 2008(2) RCR (Criminal) 910, no useful purpose would be served in prolonging the litigation.

Accordingly, FIR No.10 dated 08.08.2013 under Sections 406 and 498-A IPC, registered at Police Station Mataur (Women Cell), District SAS Nagar, and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed on the basis of compromise dated 14.12.2015 (Annexure P-2). The present petition stands disposed of.

October 19, 2016 (RITU BAHRI) naresh.k JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Naresh Kumar 2016.10.22 09:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh