Vinay Shori v. State Of Hy.Etc.

CWP-9621-2000 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-9621-2000 (O&M) Date of Decision: 18.03.2025 Dr. Vinay Kumar Shori

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana and others ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present:- Mr. Rohit Singh, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Rohit Arya, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana Mr. R. Kartikeya, Advocate, and Ms. R. Akanksha, Advocate for respondent no.3 TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed inter alia seeking a writ of certiorari quashing the orders dated 23.05.2000 and 28.04.2000, Annexure P-12 and P-13 respectively, whereby recovery of ₹5,95,523.83 paise has been sought to be effected from the petitioner's salary for the period, from 01.04.1990 to 30.09.1998, on the pretext that he was wrongly paid salary as Lecturer out of the amount of grant-in-aid received from the State Government for the period, from April, 1990 to 30.09.1998.

2.

Learned counsel for respondent no.3 fairly contends that the issue already stands decided against the respondents vide judgment dated 10.12.2024, rendered in connected matters, CWP Nos.7605 and 7606 of 2000, setting aside similar orders of recovery against the petitioners therein. PAYAL 2025.03.19 09:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-9621-2000 (O&M) -23.

In view thereof, the petition is allowed, the impugned orders dated 23.05.2000 and 28.04.2000, are hereby set aside. 4.

Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE 18.03.2025 Payal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PAYAL 2025.03.19 09:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document