Ompati & ANR v. State Of Haryana




    
    

 Date of decision: 2nd March, 2015  Ompati and another  Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana  Respondent        !
  !
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Vivek Suri, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Deepak Sabharwal, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana with ASI Narinder Singh.

 !
"#  $ Present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case FIR No.222 dated 17.08.2014 registered at Police Station Shivaji Colony, Rohtak under Sections 323/325/307/452/506/34 IPC.

Vide order dated 21.01.2015 while issuing notice of motion, the petitioners were granted interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer.
RATTAN PAL SINGH 2016.03.03 15:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



 

Learned State Counsel, on instructions from ASI Narinder Singh, submits that the petitioners have since joined the investigation and he has no objection if the interim order is made absolute. In the light of the statement made by learned State counsel, the interim bail granted to the petitioners vide order dated 21.01.2015 is made absolute till submission of report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. (challan). Thereafter, petitioners will be permitted to furnish regular bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court. With these observations, the present petition stands disposed off.

#  !
$   %&'( "

  RATTAN PAL SINGH 2016.03.03 15:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court