Sunita v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-19628 of 2015 Date of Decision : 08.07.2015 Sunita .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ....Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.P. NAGRATH

Present:

Mr. Pawan Kumar Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Dimple Jain, AAG, Haryana.

R.P. Nagrath, J. (Oral) Petitioner seeks bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in FIR No. 417 dated 29.11.2012 for offences under Sections 420 and 406 of Indian Penal Code (IPC), Police Station Sampla, District Rohtak. The petitioner was not arrested and was ultimately declared a proclaimed offender. Her husband has since been granted bail on 21.05.2014.

it is submitted that the bank loans have since been recovered by the bank by selling of six properties including Gracious hotel, though, it is contended that investment was made by the petitioner with the consent of the complainant. But that is a question which is to be ultimately determined by the trial Court. Learned State counsel submits that supplementary challan has since been presented against the petitioner on 06.05.2015.

The petitioner is in custody since 21.04.2015 and it will take some more time in conclusion of the trial. In view of the above and without commenting on merits of the case, the instant petition is allowed and petitioner be admitted to bail on furnishing bail bonds with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. July 08, 2015 ( R.P. NAGRATH ) jk JUDGE JITENDER KUMAR 2015.07.08 17:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh