Nirmal Singh And ORS v. State Of Punjab And ANR




    
    

  Date of decision: 20th July, 2015  Nirmal Singh and others

Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and another

Respondents     !  "
  "
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Navdeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. J.S. Brar, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab. None for respondent No.2.

 "
#$ !% Report dated 16.07.2015 of learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Barnala has been received whereby after recording statements of complainant Gurjant Singh and the accused persons namely Nirmal Singh, Jasbir Singh @ Soni, Malkiat Singh and Jagjit Singh @ Buta, the Court has shown its satisfaction that the compromise has been arrived at voluntarily, out of free will of the parties, without any undue influence, coercion or pressure. Heard.

RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.07.21 16:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



   In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court, the fact that parties belong to the same very village and the offences for which the accused has been hauled up are not of serious nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in resolving the personal dispute and in bringing about peace and harmony and in view of the law laid down in &'() "')*+ , "-(-.  /)0(1 ()2 ()-+.3 

 $%   $3'4')(5% 6 and &7/58')2.3 "')*+ ()2 -+.39 , "-(-.  /)0(1 ()2 ()-+.3 

 $6%   $3'4')(5% 

#the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of FIR No.4 dated 12.01.2014 registered at Police Station Sehna, District Barnala under Sections 324/323/34 IPC and all consequences arising out of the said FIR are quashed.

The petition stands allowed in those terms.

$  "
%   /5:

#

 
 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.07.21 16:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court