Ayush Kumar Goyal v. State Of Punjab




    
    

  Date of decision: 7th July, 2015  Ayush Kumar Goyal

Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab

Respondent     !  "
  "
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Munish Behl, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. C.S. Brar, Dy. Advocate General, Punjab with ASI Satnam Singh, Police Station City Sangrur.

 "
#$ !% Present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.148 dated 02.06.2015 registered at Police Station City Sangrur under Sections 3, 4 & 5 of the Immoral Traffic (Prev.) Act, 1956 (SIT Act renamed).

Vide order dated 16.06.2015 while issuing notice of motion, arrest of the petitioner was stayed subject to compliance of the provisions of Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.07.08 16:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



   Learned State Counsel, on instructions from ASI Satnam Singh, Police Station City Sangrur, submits that the petitioner has since joined the investigation and is no longer required for further investigation and nothing is to be recovered from him and he does not opposes grant of bail to the petitioner.

In the light of the statement made by learned State counsel, the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 16.06.2015 is made absolute on the same terms and conditions till submission of report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. (challan). Thereafter, petitioner will be permitted to furnish regular bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

The present petition stands disposed off accordingly. $  "
%   &'()#

 
 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.07.08 16:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court