Veena Shashi v. State Of Haryana And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-885 Date of D 59-1999 (O&M) Decision : 20.01.2025 Veena Shashi State of Haryana CORAM: HO

Present:

Non

...Petitioner

Versus

a and others ....Respondents ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBH HUVAN DAHIYA ne for the petitioner.

Ms . Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Harya ana.

TRIBHUVAN D Cou DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) unsel for the petitioner reportedl ly expired, and vide order dated d 14.10.2024, fres sh notice was issued to the peti itioner. Despite service having g been effected, th here is no appearance on his beh half. It appears the petitioner is s not interested in n pursuing the matter, or it has b been rendered infructuous due to o afflux of time.

Dis smissed for want of prosecution.

January 20, 202 ps (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable :

Yes/No :

Yes/No PUSHPINDER SAINI 2025.01.21 14:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document