Vijay Kumar v. Mahle And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.221 Date of Decision: 04.12.2025 ...Appellant

Versus

....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present:- None for the appellant.

Mr. Harjinder Singh, Advocate for respondent No.3-Insurance Company.

***** MANDEEP PANNU, J. (Oral) It is partly burnt case.

There is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Even, the documents on record are not legible.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution, with liberty to revive it within a period of two months from today, if need arises.

All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (MANDEEP PANNU) 04.12.2025 JUDGE Anu Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No ANU 2025.12.05 16:09 I am the author of this document Chandigarh