Sandeep Singh v. State Of Punjab And ANR.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 18.07.2018 Sandeep Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and another

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR

Present:

Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Ms. Seena Mand, DAG, Punjab.

Ms. Aastha, Advocate, for respondent No.2.

**** JAISHREE THAKUR, J. (ORAL) This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quashing of FIR No. 306 dated 20.12.2015 under Section 498-A IPC registered at Police Station Tanda, District Hoshiapur (Annexure P-1) and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of the compromise entered into between the parties. The marriage of respondent No. 2 was solemnized with the petitioner on 18.18.2013 according to Sikh rites and ceremonies. Out of this wedlock one son, namely Sukhpreet, was born. However, due to temperamental differences between the husband and wife, matrimonial dispute arose and the aforesaid FIR was lodged by respondent No. 2. However, now with the intervention of respectable persons, the matrimonial

-2dispute has been amicably settled between the parties and they have entered into a compromise.

Keeping in view the fact that the parties have entered into a compromise, they were directed to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate for getting their statements recorded in support of the compromise. In pursuance of the direction, a report has been received from the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Dasuya, stating that the compromise arrived at between the parties is without any pressure or coercion from any one and the same appears to be genuine one.

Ms. Seena Mand, learned DAG, Punjab on instructions from the Investigating Officer, and learned counsel for respondent No. 2 admit to the factum of compromise and submit that in case the parties have indeed settled their dispute, they would have no objection to the quashing of the FIR, in view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. I have heard learned counsel for the rival parties and gone through the record.

In a decision, based on compromise, none of the parties is a loser. Rather, a compromise not only brings peace and harmony between the parties to a dispute, but also restores tranquility in the society. After considering the nature of offences allegedly committed and the fact that both the parties have amicably settled their dispute, continuance of criminal prosecution would be an exercise in futility, as the chances of ultimate conviction are bleak.

Consequently, keeping in view the fact that the dispute has been

-3amicably settled and in view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Narinder Singh & others vs. State of Punjab & another, (2014) 6 SCC 466, this petition is allowed, FIR No. 306 dated 20.12.2015 under Section 498-A IPC registered at Police Station Tanda, District Hoshiapur (Annexure P-1)) and all subsequent proceedings arising out of the same are quashed qua the petitioner.

The petition stands disposed of.

18.07.2018 (JAISHREE THAKUR) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes.

Whether reportable No.