Sachin Kumar And Another v. State Of Haryana And Another

In The High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh CRM-M-13260-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 04.09.2024 Sachin Kumar and another ... Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and another ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL Present:- Mr. Akshay Kumar Dahiya, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Neeraj Sheoran, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Deepak Dahiya, Advocate for Mr. Mukul Khatri, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ***** GURVINDER SINGH GILL , J . (Oral) 1.

Petitioners-Sachin Kumar and Chander Phool have approached this Court seeking quashing of FIR No.0368, dated 08.07.2019, Police Station Sonipat City, Sonipat, under Sections 323, 506, 34 IPC, and all subsequent proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of a compromise having been effected between the parties. 2.

Vide order dated 14.03.2024, the parties had been directed to appear before the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate so as to get their statements recorded qua the factum of compromise.

MOHAN SINGH 2024.09.04 17:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh

CRM-M-13260-2024 (O&M) - 2 - 3.

Report of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Sonipat, has been received, wherein it has been reported that the statement of petitioners/accused Sachin Kumar, Chander Phool and complainant Kusum have been recorded to the effect that they have compromised the matter amongst themselves.

4.

Complainant Kusum in her statement had stated that she has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed. 5.

The learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Sonipat, has specifically opined that the parties have entered into compromise voluntarily without there being any pressure, coercion or undue influence. 6.

In view of the aforesaid compromise and bearing in mind the law laid down by Full Bench of this Court in 2007(3) RCR (Crl.) 1052 Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab, the present petition is allowed and FIR No.0368, dated 08.07.2019, Police Station Sonipat City, Sonipat, under Sections 323, 506, 34 IPC and all subsequent proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed qua the petitioners.

04.09.2024 (GURVINDER SINGH GILL) mohan JUDGE Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No MOHAN SINGH 2024.09.04 17:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh