← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/19928/2015allowed

Dhoop Singh And ANR v. State Of Haryana

2015-10-06Mr. Justice S.C. Malte2 pages

CRM-M-19928-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-19928-2015 Date of Decision: October 6, 2015 Dhoop Singh and another

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI

Present:

Mr. Shalender Mohan, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. Sanjay Kumar, AAG, Haryana, for the respondent.

1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J (Oral) At the outset it is apposite to mention here that the present petition was filed by Dhoop Singh and Shiv Kumar @ Devi. However, in view of the statement suffered by learned counsel for the petitioners, present petition qua petitioner No. 1, Dhoop Singh, was disposed of as having been rendered infructuous, vide order PRASHANT KAPOOR 2015.10.06 18:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRM-M-19928-2015 dated 30.7.2015, passed by this Court.

Prayer in this petition, filed under Section 438, Cr.P.C., is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, Shiv Kumar @ Devi, son of Chand Kishore, resident of Harsa, presently resident of Barwala, District Hisar, who has been booked for having committed the offences punishable under Sections 285, 341, 392, 427 and 506, IPC, and Section 25 of the Arms Act, in a case arising out of FIR No. 325, dated 5.9.2014, registered at Police Station, City, Barwala, District Hisar.

Learned counsel for the State on instructions from SI Ashok Kumar of CIA Staff, Hisar, very fairly concedes that in terms of the interim directions dated 30.7.2015, passed by this Court, the petitioner did join the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required.

In view of above, present petition is allowed. The interim directions, dated 30.7.2015, passed by this Court are made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join the investigation as and when required to do so and abide by all the conditions laid down under Section 438(2), Cr.PC.

(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE October 6, 2015 Pkapoor PRASHANT KAPOOR 2015.10.06 18:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document