Sahab Ram v. State Of Haryana

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ......

Criminal Misc. No.M-20918 of 2016 .....

Date of decision:26.8.2016 Sahab Ram

...Petitioner

v.

State of Haryana

...Respondent

....

Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh .....

Present:

Mr. Vivek Khatri, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikramjit Singh, Additional Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent-State.

.....

Inderjit Singh, J.

This petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.386 dated 30.6.2015 registered for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 307, 379 and 325 IPC at Police Station Ratia, District Fatehabad.

Notice of motion has been issued in this case. Mr. Vikramjit Singh, learned Additional Advocate General, Haryana has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent-State and contested this petition.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Advocate General, Haryana appearing for the respondent-State and have gone through the record. Harpal Singh Parmar 2016.08.27 16:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Cr. Misc. No.M-20918 of 2016 [2] As per the FIR, Sahab Ram-present petitioner is stated to be armed with a `Kulhari' and gave `Kulhari' blow which hit on little finger of his left hand, due to which left hand finger had been cut-down and which also hit on the head. Copy of the MLR has been placed on the record. The injuries on the person of the complainant, specially injury No.1, is stated to have been given with blunt weapon. All injuries have been declared with blunt weapon.

The present petitioner has been in custody since 19.8.2015. The petitioner is not required for investigation or interrogation purposes. The trial of the case will take long time. No useful purpose will be served by keeping the petitioner in custody till the final disposal of the case. Therefore, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case; without discussing the facts in minute detail and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail subject to his furnishing personal bond in the sum of `50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate.

August 26, 2016.

(Inderjit Singh) Judge *hsp* NOTE:

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No Harpal Singh Parmar 2016.08.27 16:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh