Gaurav And ORS v. State Of Haryana

Crl. Misc. No. M-21 of 2018 -1In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Misc. No. M-21 of 2018 Date of Decision: 27.7.2018 Gaurav and others ......Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY

Present:

Mr. Jagjot Singh, Advocate for Mr. Kunal Dawar, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Mahima Yashpal, AAG, Haryana assisted by SI Rohtash.

Mr. Naveen Sharma, Advocate for the complainant.

**** ANITA CHAUDHRY, J (ORAL) Through the instant petition, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 113 dated 7.12.2017, registered under Sections 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 and Section 354-D, 406, 506 IPC, Women Police Station, Palwal, Haryana.

Counsel for the petitioner states that pursuant to the order dated 18.1.2018, passed by this Court, the petitioners have joined the investigation.

State counsel states that the petitioners have joined the investigation.

Compromise has been effected. A separate petition for quashing of the FIR is fixed for today. The parties have been directed to Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2018.07.30 11:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

Crl. Misc. No. M-21 of 2018 -2make the statements with regard to compromise. Looking to the circumstances, but without commenting on the merits of the case, the petition is allowed and order dated 18.1.2018 granting interim bail to the petitioners is made absolute subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438 Sub Section 2 Clauses (i)(ii) and (iii) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE July 27, 2018 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2018.07.30 11:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh