Tejinder Kumar v. State Of Haryana And Another

CRM-M-21015-2018 - 1238-1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M No.21015 of 2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: 14.08.2024 Tejinder Kumar

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and Another

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Vivek Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashish Bishnoi, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. S.K. Narawna, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sukesh Kumar Jindal, Advocate for the complainant.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

FIR No.

Dated Police Station Sections 21.03.2018 Gohana, City District Sonipat 120-B, 406, 420 and 506 IPC 1.

Seeking quashing of FIR captioned above and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, the petitioner has come up before this Court under Section 482, Cr.P.C. 2.

State counsel submits that cancellation report in the matter, has been prepared. As such, nothing survives in the petition and the present petition has been rendered infructuous.

3.

Counsel for the complainant submits that they have filed protest petition. 3.

Given above, the present petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. Liberty reserved to the petitioner to file fresh petition or to take other legal remedies in accordance with the law. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 14.08.2024 Sonia Puri Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No.

Sonia Puri 2024.08.21 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document