M/S Adree Infrastructure v. Haryana State Pollution Control Board Etc

Crl.Misc. No.M-22858 of 2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH.

Crl.Misc. No.M-22858 of 2013 Date of Decision : 11.12.2015 M/s Ardee Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

......Petitioner Vs.

Regional Officer, Gurgaon Region, Haryana State Pollution Control Board and another ......Respondents ...

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK ...

Present :

Mr. Gautam Dutt and Mr. Karan Pathak, Advocates for the petitioner.

Mr. Vikas Chopra, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Deepak Balyan, Advocate.

...

1. To be referred to the Reporter or not ?

2. Whether the judgement should be reported in Digest ? RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK, J Petitioner, by way of instant petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (`Cr.P.C.' for short) seeks quashing of the impugned complaint (Annexure P-1) and also the summoning order (Annexure P-5), however, without availing its equally, efficacious alternative remedy of revision against the impugned summoning order.

In view of the above, petitioner is relegated to its equally efficacious, alternative remedy of revision against the impugned summoning order at the first instance, however, with liberty to the petitioner to approach this court again, if necessity arises. It is also made clear that if the petitioner files an appropriate revision petition against the impugned summoning order within a GREESH SAHNI 2015.12.14 13:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Crl.Misc. No.M-22858 of 2013 period of six weeks from today, respondent-complainant shall not raise the issue of limitation.

Disposed of, accordingly.

11.12.2015 (RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK) GS JUDGE GREESH SAHNI 2015.12.14 13:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh