Hannan v. State Of Haryana And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No. 21063 of 2018 DATE OF DECISION :- August 16, 2018 Hannan

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN Present:- Mr. Rohit Rana, Advocate for Mr. Kunal Dawar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Bansal, AAG, Haryana.

*** Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner has since joined the investigation. This fact is conceded by learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Mohd. Yunus. He states that the petitioner is not required for further investigation by the local police. Under such circumstances, the interim bail granted to the petitioner on 17.5.2018 is made absolute, subject to his fulfilling conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

The petition stands allowed accordingly.

(H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE August 16, 2018 p.singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PARVINDER SINGH 2018.08.16 16:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh