Bimla Devi v. Rajiv Rattan
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
E HIGH COURT OF PUNJ JAB AND HARYANA ARH IN THE AT CHANDIGA CM-20800-CII-2 2024 and CM-20801-CII-2024 in/and COCP-853-2023 Decision: January 17, 2025 Date of D ........Applicant/Petitioner BIMLA DEVI RAJIV RATTA CORAM: HO
Present:
M fo Mr
Versus
AN ........Respondent ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARK KESH MANUJA Mr. Aryavart Chaudhary, Advoc cate or the applicant-petitioner.
r. Arun Beniwal, Sr. DAG, Har ryana.
**** ANUJA, J. (ORAL) HARKESH MA CM-20800-CII I-2024 and CM-20801-CII-202 Le earned counsel for the ap pplicant-petitioner wishes to o withdraw the p present applications.
Dis smissed as withdrawn.
MAIN CASE Le earned State counsel on ins structions from Ms. Garima a Kamboj, Lega al Assistant, Technical Educa ation Department, Panchkula a informs that the retiral benefits payab ble to the deceased-Bimla a Devi/petitioner r has already been released in favour of one of her sons s namely, Ravin nder in terms of registered Wi ll dated 18.03.2024 executed d in his favour b by the deceased.
In such circumstances, nothi ng survives in the present t petition and th he same is thus disposed of.
Ru ule discharged.
Pe ending application(s), if any, s shall also stand disposed of.
17.01.2025 Tejwinder Whether speaking/reasoned (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE d Yes/No Yes/No Whether Reportable TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.01.18 12:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document