High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/20169/2017allowed

Gurpreet Singh @ Goldy v. State Of Punjab

2017-09-19Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj2 pages

CRM-M-20169-2017 and CRM-M-21070-2017 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH.

1. Crl. Misc. No.M-20169 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: September 19, 2017 Gurpreet Singh @ Goldy ......PETITIONER(s).

VERSUS

State of Punjab ....RESPONDENT(s).

2. Crl. Misc. No.M-21070 of 2017 (O&M) Karan Singh Walia ......PETITIONER(s).

VERSUS

State of Punjab ....RESPONDENT(s).

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. A.P.S.Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner in CRM-M-20169-2017.

Mr. Jasreet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner in CRM-M-21070-2017.

Mr. Luvinder Sofat, A.A.G., Punjab.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) The above mentioned petitions have been filed under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case FIR No. 101 dated 13.05.2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 452, 323, 148, 427 read with Section 149 of Indian Penal Code at Police Station Division No. 6, District Police Jyoti 2017.09.19 17:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRM-M-20169-2017 and CRM-M-21070-2017 -2Commissionerate Ludhiana.

Heard.

Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Raschpal Singh submits that petitioners have joined the investigation which is still in progress but their custodial interrogation is not required for the purpose of further investigation.

In view of submission of learned State counsel but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, both the petitions are allowed and the order dated 01.06.2017 passed in CRM-M- 20169-2017 and order dated 05.06.2017 passed in CRM-M-21070-2017 are made absolute till the presentation of challan, subject to the following terms:- (i) that the petitioners shall make himself available for interrogation by the police as and when required; (ii) that the petitioners shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the accusation against them so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

(iii) that the petitioners shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court.

(iv) that the petitioners will seek regular bail on the presentation of challan in Court.

( SURINDER GUPTA ) September 19, 2017 JUDGE Jyoti-II Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Jyoti 2017.09.19 17:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document