Ankit Taneja v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-20124 of 2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: 2.7.2015 Ankit Taneja .....Petitioner Vs.

State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK Present : Mr. V. Ramswaroop, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK J. (ORAL) Petitioner seeks bail pending trial in FIR No. 57 dated 14.3.2015 under Sections 21/22-C/27-A/ of the NDPS Act, registered at Police Station, Ellenabad, District Sirsa. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is running a chemist shop and is having the requisite license. He further submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case by the local police. He concluded by submitting that the mandatory provisions of Section 50 of the NDPS Act have been glaringly violated in the present case which entitles the petitioner for the concession of bail pending trial. He prays for allowing the present petition.

On the other hand, learned counsel for the State submits that provisions of Section 50 of the NDPS Act were duly complied with. A heavy recovery was effected from the petitioner. He further AMIT KUMAR 2015.07.02 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

submits that after carrying out an effective investigation, report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. has already been presented to the court of competent jurisdiction and the next date of hearing is 13.7.2015 for framing of charge. He prays for dismissal of the present petition. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not intend to press this petition and the same may be dismissed as not pressed.

Dismissed as not pressed, at this stage.

(RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK) JUDGE 2.7.2015 Ak Sharma AMIT KUMAR 2015.07.02 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document