High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/20176/2017allowed

Tarsem Singh v. State Of Punjab

2017-11-22Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj2 pages

CRM-M-20176-2017 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH.

Crl. Misc. No.M-20176 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 22, 2017 Tarsem Singh ......PETITIONER(s).

VERSUS

State of Punjab ....RESPONDENT(s).

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. SPS Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner (s).

Mr. C.L.Pawar, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 203 dated 15.10.2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 452, 447, 448, 336, 511, 427, 148 read with Section 149 of Indian Penal Code and 25, 27 of Arms Act at Police Station Gate Hakiman, District Amritsar City.

Heard.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has since been amicably settled between the parties through compromise deed dated 15.11.2017, photocopy of which has been placed on file. Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Salvinder Singh submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation which is still Jyoti 2017.11.22 16:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-20176-2017 -2in progress. It is a cross version case. The custodial interrogation of petitioner is not required for the purpose of further investigation. In view of submission of learned State counsel but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is allowed and the order dated 06.07.2017 is made absolute till the presentation of challan, subject to the following terms:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by the police as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the accusation against him so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court.

(iv) that the petitioner will seek regular bail on the presentation of challan in Court, which the trial Court will decide on the basis of evidence collected during investigation.

( SURINDER GUPTA ) November 22, 2017 JUDGE Jyoti-II Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Jyoti 2017.11.22 16:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH