← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/5988/2026disposed of

Jasdeep Singh Nagpal v. Union Territory Chandigarh And Others

2026-04-16Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-5988-2026 Date of Decision: 16.04.2026 JASDEEP SINGH NAGPAL

...Petitioner

Vs.

UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS

...Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Arshit Goel, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Avinit Avasthi, Addl. Standing Counsel and Mr. Himanshu Malik, Jr. Panel Counsel for respondents No.1 and 2 *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondent No.1 and 2 to address his complaint dated 25.09.2025 filed against respondent No.3.

2.

On 26.02.2026, the following order was passed by this Court:- "Counsel for the petitioner asserts that his siblingrespondent No.3, who is posted as Vice Principal with Govt. Model Sr. Sec. School Sector 37-B, Chandigarh, is carrying on private business, while discharging government duties. He submits that the petitioner has given complaint, Annexure P-4, to the Director, School Education, which has not been inquired into.

Advance copy of the petition has been served upon the official respondents.

DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.04.16 16:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-5988-2026 -2Mr. Himanshu Malik, Advocate, has put in appearance on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2. He has instructions to state that the complaint is being examined by the Director, School Education-respondent No.2 and requests for short accommodation to file a status report. List on 16.04.2026"

3.

Learned counsel for the respondent submits that matter is under investigation and petitioner's compliant dated 25.09.2025 would be addressed within four weeks from today.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to the aforesaid arrangement.

5.

In the wake of statement of both sides, the instant petition stands disposed of 6.

It is made clear that outcome of inquiry would be communicated to petitioner.

7.

Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE April 16, 2026 Deepak DPA Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.04.16 16:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document