Sonia v. State Of Haryana And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CRM-M-211-2016 Date of Decision:- 04.10.2016 Sonia ....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and another ....Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present:- Ms. Ritu Pathak, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. D.K. Singla, DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Sarfraj Hussain, Advocate for respondent No.2.
**** RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since trial has already been transferred, therefore, the present petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as such. In this view of the matter, the instant petition is dismissed, as having become infructuous.
October 04, 2016 ( RITU BAHRI ) naresh.k JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Naresh Kumar 2016.10.07 12:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh