← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/11638/2026allowed

Bant Singh v. State Of Punjab

2026-04-30Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh2 pages

106A In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Criminal Misc. No. M-11638 of 2026 Date of Decision: 30.04.2026 Bant Singh ... Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Punjab ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh.

Present:

Ms. Rashi Vashisht, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. I.P.S.Sabharwal, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondent.

Surya Partap Singh, J.

1.

This petition for anticipatory bail is the first petition filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of 'the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023'. It has been filed with regard to a case arising out of DDR No. 27 dated 08.01.2026, for the commission of offence punishable under Section(s) 118(1), 118(2), 115(2), 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of 'the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023', hereinafter being referred to as "BNS" only, in FIR No. 02 dated 05.01.2026, for the commission of offence punishable under Section(s) 118(1), 118(2), 115(2), 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of BNS, Police Station Mehal Kalan, District Barnala, Punjab. 2.

Vide order dated 10.03.2026, the petitioner was admitted to interim anticipatory bail, subject to the condition of furnishing bonds to the satisfaction of arresting officer. It was also directed that the petitioner shall DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2026.04.30 17:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Criminal Misc. No. M-11638 of 2026 join the investigation.

3.

Heard.

4.

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in compliance with order dated 10.03.2026, the petitioner has already joined the investigation, and that nothing has been left to be recovered from the possession of petitioner. In view of above, the learned counsel for the petitioner has requested that the order dated 10.03.2026 be made absolute. 5.

The learned State counsel, on instructions from 'ASI Labh Singh', has submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation, and that for further investigation of this case his custodial interrogation is not required.

6.

The record has been perused carefully.

7.

Keeping in view the aforesaid submissions and the fact that the petitioner has already joined the investigation, it is hereby ordered that the petitioner is entitled for anticipatory bail. Hence, the present petition is hereby allowed and the order dated 10.03.2026, whereby the petitioner was accorded the benefit of interim anticipatory bail, is hereby made absolute. (Surya Partap Singh) Judge April 30, 2026 "DK"

Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2026.04.30 17:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document