High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/204/2017allowed

Amit v. State Of Haryana

2017-04-19Mr. Justice Harinder Singh Sidhu2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-204 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 19, 2017 Amit

...Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr.R.N.Kush, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.

Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.405 dated 07.11.2015 under Sections 307, 323, 302, 34 IPC and Section 25, 27, and 30 of the Arms Act, registered at Police Station Sadar Hansi, District Hisar. Notice of motion.

Mr.B.S.Virk, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent-State and contested the petition. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel and have gone through the record. From the record, I find that as per FIR, the present petitioner has not given any injury to the deceased. He has given simple injury to one Surinder. It is brought to my notice that during trial, witness Surinder has Vineet Gulati 2017.04.20 14:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh not been examined and has been given up by the prosecution. Furthermore,

CRM No.M-204 of 2017 -2the injury is stated to be caused by jelly by present petitioner Amit Kumar but as per the medical record, injury is abrasion and caused by blunt weapon.

The present petitioner has been in custody since December 2015. He is not required for any investigation or interrogation purposes as he is in judicial custody. The trial of the case will take long time. No useful purpose will be served by keeping the petitioner in custody till disposal of the case.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case, without discussing the facts in minute detail and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail subject to his furnishing personal/surety bonds in the sum of `50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate. April 19, 2017 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Vineet Gulati 2017.04.20 14:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh