← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/24362/2012disposed of

Prabhjot Singh Matharu v. Ut Of Chandigarh And Another

2015-08-13Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh2 pages

KAPIL 2015.08.17 17:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh CRM-M-24362-2012 (O&M) In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. CRM-M-24362-2012 (O&M) Date of Decision:13.08.2015 Parabjot Singh Matharu

...Petitioner

Versus

State of UT, Chandigarh and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA

Present:

Mr. ABS Wasu, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate, for U.T. Chandigarh.

None for respondent No.2.

***** SABINA, J.

Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of order dated 18.05.2007.

At the time of notice of motion, following order was passed by this Court on 27.08.2012:- "Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was wrongly declared as proclaimed offender and no service was effected upon him as he was away to Canada. The intention of the petitioner was never to avoid the court proceedings or his absence was not willful. Learned counsel for

KAPIL 2015.08.17 17:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh CRM-M-24362-2012 (O&M) the petitioner submits that a compromise has also been effected between the parties and the complainant has no objection in quashing of FIR.

Notice of motion for 31.10.2012.

In case the petitioner surrenders/appears before the trial Court within one month from today, he shall be released on interim bail to its satisfaction.

Meanwhile, proceedings declaring proclaimed offender be kept in abeyance."

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in pursuance to the above order, petitioner has surrendered before the trial Court and has furnished the necessary bail bonds.

During the course of arguments, it has transpired that the FIR in question has already been quashed by this Court as the parties have amicably settled their dispute. Consequently, the impugned order dated 18.05.2007 is set aside.

Petition stands disposed of accordingly.

August 13, 2015 (SABINA) kapil JUDGE