Brij Lal And ORS v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM M-21342 of 2018 Date of decision : 02.08.2018 Brij Lal & ors.

....Petitioner V/s State of Haryana ....Respondent BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA

Present:

Mr. K.S. Lakhanpal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Kapil Bansal, DAG Haryana.

Ms. Kamlesh, Advocate for Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for the complainant. RAJAN GUPTA J.

Learned State counsel seeks to place on record affidavit of Sudhir Taneja, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Barara, district Ambala. Prayer is accepted. Affidavit is taken on record. Learned State counsel submits that out of twenty four witnesses cited by the prosecution, twenty two have been examined. Trial is likely to culminate soon.

As the trial is at its fag end, no case for enlarging the petitioner on bail is made out. Dismissed.

Trial court shall, however, endeavor to conclude the trial expeditiously, preferably within three months. August 02, 2018 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No Ajay Kumar 2018.08.03 12:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document