Ram Saran v. State Of Haryana




    
    

 Date of decision: 24th September, 2015  Ram Saran  Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana  Respondent        !
  !
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Salil Bali, Advocate for Mr. Amrinder Vir Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Munish Sharma, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana.

 !
"#  $ Present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner Ram Saran in case FIR No.96 dated 04.03.2015 registered at Police Station Civil Lines, Rohtak under Sections 193/420/467/468/471/1209B IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in consequence of the orders of interim bail dated 23.06.2015 passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined investigations which is not controverted by learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Krishan Lal, Police Station Civil Lines, Rohtak who submits that the RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.09.24 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



   petitioner is no longer required for further investigation and nothing is to be recovered from him and that he has no objection if the interim order is made absolute.

In the light of what has been stated above, the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 23.06.2015 is made absolute on the same terms and conditions till submission of report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. (challan). Thereafter, petitioner will be permitted to furnish regular bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court. The petition stands disposed off accordingly. #  !
$   !%&'%()%*+"


 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.09.24 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court