Sunita Devi v. Sukhdev Singh And Others

 

  


      



  

 

!"!

#$ %& '

()  *+#!  ,!

---- !!

# & .

&"+"

*+/'

, *!#0'

#

'

&"

---- "1 # #"

%$  23 %- *
 

4* 3
 

   







 

 





4* 3)  5&67 

!  "

#   

  

 

  

      $   America. The petitioner filed an application for her impleadment as a co-plaintiff which has been dismissed by the trial court. It is evident that case is now at the stage of plaintiff's evidence. The trial Court has even permitted the plaintiff to depose through video conferencing. The petitioner has filed this revision petition to challenge the correctness of the aforesaid order passed by the Trial Court. 2.

Learned counsel representing the petitioner contends that the petitioner's husband has migrated to the United States of America illegally and therefore he cannot go to the Indian Embassy to record his evidence to attend the court proceedings, hence the application was filed. 3.

This Court has considered the submissions of the learned counsel representing the petitioner. It is evident that the petitioner is the plaintiff's wife. ARCHANA ARORA 2024.03.21 09:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

  She, in absence of the plaintiff should be permitted to prosecute the case on behalf of her husband.

4.

Keeping in view the aforesaid facts the revision petition is disposed of with a direction to the trial court to permit the petitioner to prosecute the case on behalf of her husband including the appearance in evidence. %

& '



  

          

(





   #)

5

4* 37

 %& '

()  archana 8'

'

& "1 /!#09& "

#

$  "

8'

'

& & &:6

$ ARCHANA ARORA 2024.03.21 09:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document